S3 EP 8 - How to NOT Answer Questions
0:00-13:00
thinking as perceiving
dwelling in the problematic
slogans in philosophy
H’s notion that philosophical questions cannot (structurally) have answers
13:00-19:00
thinking the movement of thinking
rendering the unthought thinkable
Heidegger’s ambitions as a philosopher
19:00-31:00
essence as ambiguity
Heidegger’s fetishizing of ambiguity
the problem of common speech and language
31:00-40:00
calcification as a way of enabling difference and complexity
how posing a definitive answer to a philosophical question is not inherently reductive or restricting
why representational thinking is “too advanced” for Heidegger
40:00-end
the anti- or post-Hegelian project
why is Nate bringing up Hegel again?
Karen Barad’s orientation
negotiating intellectual subject positions
the violence of subjectivity
thinking as perceiving
dwelling in the problematic
slogans in philosophy
H’s notion that philosophical questions cannot (structurally) have answers
13:00-19:00
thinking the movement of thinking
rendering the unthought thinkable
Heidegger’s ambitions as a philosopher
19:00-31:00
essence as ambiguity
Heidegger’s fetishizing of ambiguity
the problem of common speech and language
31:00-40:00
calcification as a way of enabling difference and complexity
how posing a definitive answer to a philosophical question is not inherently reductive or restricting
why representational thinking is “too advanced” for Heidegger
40:00-end
the anti- or post-Hegelian project
why is Nate bringing up Hegel again?
Karen Barad’s orientation
negotiating intellectual subject positions
the violence of subjectivity
The podcast Thinking With... A Rhetorical Theory Podcast is embedded on this page from an open RSS feed. All files, descriptions, artwork and other metadata from the RSS-feed is the property of the podcast owner and not affiliated with or validated by Podplay.