The pros and cons of investing your retirement assets 100% in equity, including half in international stocks. Why the 4% spending rule is too aggressive.
- Why historical asset class return studies that use only U.S. data are biased
- How researchers build a broader database to study retirement outcomes and spending rates
- How a 100% stock portfolio performed compared to balanced portfolios and target date funds
- Why investors should have half their assets in international stocks
- Why a 4% spending rule is too high, and what is the alternative
Sponsor
NetSuite – Get your free KPI checklist
Insiders Guide Email Newsletter
Get our free Investors' Checklist when you sign up for the free Money for the Rest of Us email newsletter
Our Premium Products
Show Notes
Related Episodes
421: Beware of Survivorship Bias When Investing
326: The New Math of Retirement Spending and Investing
254: Should You Be 100% Invested In Stocks?
250: Investing Rule One: Avoid Ruin
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
The podcast Money For the Rest of Us is embedded on this page from an open RSS feed. All files, descriptions, artwork and other metadata from the RSS-feed is the property of the podcast owner and not affiliated with or validated by Podplay.